Post by xyz3400 on Feb 20, 2024 3:17:15 GMT
Water companies in Goiás are obliged to indicate on their product labels whether the water sold is mineral or not. The decision was made by judge Maria Divina Vitória, from the 7th Federal Court in Goiás. The first instance granted an injunction in a Public Civil Action filed by the Federal Public Ministry against the Union and the National Department of Mineral Production. According to the action, it was found that most brands of water sold in Goiás are not mineral, but are called that way. This is because the physical-chemical compositions presented on the label are not sufficient to classify them as mineral waters. The judge ordered the National Department of Mineral Production to, within 90 days, review and change the classification authorizations stamped on the labels of all water brands sold in Goiás, adapting them to the parameters indicated in the reports issued by the laboratory accredited officer.
It also determined that, when changing the classification, the Department will no longer allow the use, on the labels of packaging of common drinking water, of any classification that designates it as mineral. Companies will be notified to arrange for the printing of new labels within 30 days.He recalled that Criminal Law recommends that the defendant's confession be distrusted. “Why doesn’t the same Honduras Mobile Number List happen in Tax Law?” Estevão Horvath began his talk by saying that he could summarize it as a denial of everything Sacha Calmon had said before. He stated that the launch by approval is a fiction, but it exists. He acknowledged that it is up to the Treasury to make the assessment, but that the taxpayer does it. “The law obliges the taxpayer to do what is the State's obligation: he identifies himself, points out the triggering event, determines how much he owes, and makes the assessment. When the credit is paid, the launch is provisionally terminated,” he stated.
The insertion of paragraph 7 to article 150 of the Federal Constitution did not appease the indoctrinators, as shown by Sacha Calmon, citing an article published by Aroldo Gomes de Mattos: Even after the advent of EC nº 3/93, which added § 7 to art. 150 of the Federal Constitution, allowing the law to institute the 'forward' (progressive) tax substitution regime, continues to understand the majority of the doctrine (Geraldo Ataliba, Alcides Jorge Costa, Ives Gandra Silva Martins, Hamilton Dias de Souza, Roberto de Siqueira Campos , José Eduardo Soares de Mello, among others), that such a regime is unconstitutional, unlike the 'backward' (regressive) tax substitution, which has always had its constitutionality known (CTN, arts. 121 and 128) . [two] This is the content of the precept incorporated into the Constitution: Art.
It also determined that, when changing the classification, the Department will no longer allow the use, on the labels of packaging of common drinking water, of any classification that designates it as mineral. Companies will be notified to arrange for the printing of new labels within 30 days.He recalled that Criminal Law recommends that the defendant's confession be distrusted. “Why doesn’t the same Honduras Mobile Number List happen in Tax Law?” Estevão Horvath began his talk by saying that he could summarize it as a denial of everything Sacha Calmon had said before. He stated that the launch by approval is a fiction, but it exists. He acknowledged that it is up to the Treasury to make the assessment, but that the taxpayer does it. “The law obliges the taxpayer to do what is the State's obligation: he identifies himself, points out the triggering event, determines how much he owes, and makes the assessment. When the credit is paid, the launch is provisionally terminated,” he stated.
The insertion of paragraph 7 to article 150 of the Federal Constitution did not appease the indoctrinators, as shown by Sacha Calmon, citing an article published by Aroldo Gomes de Mattos: Even after the advent of EC nº 3/93, which added § 7 to art. 150 of the Federal Constitution, allowing the law to institute the 'forward' (progressive) tax substitution regime, continues to understand the majority of the doctrine (Geraldo Ataliba, Alcides Jorge Costa, Ives Gandra Silva Martins, Hamilton Dias de Souza, Roberto de Siqueira Campos , José Eduardo Soares de Mello, among others), that such a regime is unconstitutional, unlike the 'backward' (regressive) tax substitution, which has always had its constitutionality known (CTN, arts. 121 and 128) . [two] This is the content of the precept incorporated into the Constitution: Art.